docs: announce EMNLP 2026 Findings acceptance (news entry + badge) - #321
Merged
Conversation
The paper has been accepted to EMNLP 2026 Findings — an archival venue, and a stronger credibility signal than the COLM 2026 WAB workshop line that was until now the only venue on the page. - News entry at the top of the README, docs/README.zh-CN.md and the docs/news.md archive. The existing COLM 2026 WAB entry stays: a non-archival workshop and a later archival publication are not in conflict, and the two together read as a timeline. - A trophy badge leading the visible badge row, in a deep maroon that keeps it distinct from the brighter arXiv red next to it. Citation blocks are deliberately untouched: the ACL Anthology entry (and with it the page numbers and anthology ID) does not exist yet, so switching the BibTeX to @inproceedings now would publish a less complete citation than the arXiv one it replaces. That swap is a follow-up once the proceedings are out.
Perry2004
approved these changes
Aug 22, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Our paper has been accepted to EMNLP 2026 Findings. This announces it.
What changed
README.md,docs/README.zh-CN.md, and thedocs/news.mdarchive.The existing
[2026.07.25] COLM 2026 WABentry stays. A non-archival workshop and a later archival publication are not in conflict, and the two lines together read as a timeline rather than a correction.On the badge
Findings is an archival venue and, until now, the only venue anywhere on the page was a workshop line buried in News — so this is the strongest credibility signal the README has, and it earns a slot in the visible row rather than the fold.
I rendered five variants inside the real badge row before picking. The deep maroon (
#8C1D18) with a trophy sits next to the brighter arXiv red without reading as a second arXiv link, and at 148px the row still fits on one line at normal widths. Rejected: ACL-red (competes with arXiv), green (new hue, reads utilitarian), indigo (collides with the claw-bench.com badge two slots over), andfor-the-badge(wrapped the row).Deliberately not in scope: the citation blocks
README.md's BibTeX andCITATION.cffstill point at the arXiv preprint. The ACL Anthology entry does not exist yet, so switching to@inproceedingstoday would publish a citation with no anthology ID and no page numbers — strictly less useful than the arXiv one it would replace. That swap is a clean follow-up once the proceedings are out; happy to open it then.Verification
scripts/ci/check_markdown_links.py→ all 156 repo-relative links resolve. GitHub-rendered branch page screenshot-checked: badge renders first in the row without wrapping, News section renders with the new entry on top.@Perry2004 — flagging two judgement calls for you: keeping the COLM line alongside this one, and holding the citation at arXiv until the Anthology entry exists.